The New York Times Said Dallas Was Highest-Risk Natural Disaster Metro Area — Before The Quakes.

Back in 2011, before all those quakes hit earlier this month, before we all pretended they were funny, before we actually had to wonder about how prepared we were for these things and before the idea of dying in one became a real possibility, we all like to think that things were pretty copacetic around these parts.

But the truth is that they weren't. As this 2011 graphic from the New York Times on natural disasters shows, things were pretty real around here even back then. Turns out, not every city has to deal with the “twisters, hurricane remnants, hail, wind, drought [and] floods” that Dallasites face, like, all the time. Go figure!

So just how bad were things back then? Oh, just so bad that the Times piece was already calling Dallas the “highest risk” metro area for natural disasters in America.

But — listen up — that's not even the worst part. In its ever-so-brief write-up, the Times notes that Dallas' constant natural disaster outlook was bad because it suffered from “lots of almost everything but quakes.”

Again, that piece came out in 2011, before 40 earthquakes went and shook the region up in the span of 10 months, before this kind of information stopped topping news broadcasts because we'd gotten so used to it.

Argument aside about how “natural” these quake disasters are, how effed are we all now? I mean, you guys tell me.

(Spoiler: I think we're pretty goddamn effed.)

6485_2

6485_3

6485_4

6485_5

6485_6

6485_7

6485_8

6485_9

6485_10

6485_11

6485_12

6485_13

6485_14

6485_15

6485_16

6485_17

6485_18

6485_19

6485_20

6485_21

6485_22

6485_23

6485_24

6485_25

6485_26

6485_27

6485_28

6485_29

6485_30

6485_31

6485_32

6485_33

6485_34

6485_35

6485_36

6485_37

6485_38

6485_39

6485_40

6485_41

6485_42

6485_43

6485_44

6485_45

6485_46

6485_47

6485_48

6485_49

6485_50

No more articles
X